btw just to have fun, the valid form of argument here would be (mathematically), For every person, if that person worked in google, then what he/she says is right (1). I'm a person (2). I worked at google (3). Therefore based on (2) and (3) I'm right.
It's a valid argument form, but the truth is up to be proven. They should've prove the hypothesis (1) before jumping to conclusion :))
As a software engineer, I have to say that most of the time we don't know how to present a valid and true argument. For example: I worked at google, So What I'm saying is right. It both invalid and false. But I hear that a lot lately. It's incorrect both mathematically and philosophically. It might've been better to educate yourself a bit instead of feeling proud about working for money in just another company 😂
I just had a game (#chess). I played white and went for a king's gambit. As an amateur I quite liked it.
Hehe, I have 492 buffers in my #emacs right now. It's uptime is 213 days. :D
I guess it's time for some cleanups
Time to time Something happens to me that makes me realize how much I love #freesoftware and how essential it is to our lives.
I'm working on #Serene as usual and I was working with #MLIR and suddenly hit a bug in MLIR, had to dig in to figure out the root and when I found it, just sent a patch to #LLVM and BAAM, everyone's happy
Oh what a game, what a tactic. Just brilliant. E.Lasker vs Sir G.A Thomas on 1912.
Follow the game after white queen to h7.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!